“女子公交站勸阻男子吸煙起沖突”，更多詳情披露！

近日，在深圳市一公交站臺，女子阻止男子抽煙并引起沖突一事，受到廣泛關(guān)注。有報道稱，事發(fā)于深圳市光明區(qū)，后來雙方報警。

A confrontation between a woman and a man smoking at a bus stop in Shenzhen's Guangming district, in Guangdong province, has drawn widespread public attention. The incident, which took place at a transit shelter, led both parties to call the police.

4月25日，深圳市光明區(qū)聯(lián)合調(diào)查組發(fā)布情況通報，經(jīng)警方調(diào)解，雙方最終達成和解。同時，深圳市交通運輸局光明分局依法對陳某在禁止吸煙場所吸煙的行為處以行政罰款。

On Saturday, a joint investigation team in Guangming district said the two sides reached a settlement following police mediation. Separately, the Guangming branch of the Shenzhen transportation bureau imposed an administrative fine on the man, identified as Chen, for smoking in a non-smoking area.

據(jù)《深圳特區(qū)報》記者4月25日調(diào)查，警方將兩人帶到玉塘派出所后按照執(zhí)法程序進行了人身安全檢查。關(guān)于民警曾表示“公交站應(yīng)不屬于禁煙范圍”，在當事人提出質(zhì)疑、民警查詢相關(guān)法規(guī)后發(fā)現(xiàn)錯誤，已當場糾正并致歉。

According to an investigation published by Shenzhen Special Zone Daily on Saturday, police took both individuals to Yutang police station for routine procedures. Regarding earlier claims that an officer had said bus stops "may not be covered by the smoking ban," the report said the officer later reviewed the relevant regulations, acknowledged the mistake and issued an immediate apology after being questioned by the woman, identified as Wang.

此事在社交媒體上引起廣泛關(guān)注。其中焦點問題之一，是該男子在站臺吸煙該不該處罰？

記者了解到，4月25日上午，深圳市交通運輸局光明分局執(zhí)法支隊根據(jù)派出所提供的線索，對陳某在公交站臺吸煙的違法行為展開核查。

經(jīng)調(diào)查，陳某承認其在禁止吸煙的公交站臺吸煙的事實。執(zhí)法人員認定其行為違反深圳市有關(guān)條例，執(zhí)法部門已依據(jù)條例依法對陳某處以50元罰款，并當場執(zhí)行。

So, should Chen have been penalized for smoking at the bus stop? The investigation found that Chen admitted to smoking in the restricted area. Authorities determined that the act violated local regulations and imposed a 50 yuan fine on the spot.

針對公眾關(guān)心的公交站臺吸煙違規(guī)及處罰問題，深圳市交通運輸局光明分局相關(guān)負責人向記者表示，依據(jù)《深圳經(jīng)濟特區(qū)控制吸煙條例》第八條第二款第六項規(guī)定，公共交通運輸站樓行人出入口外側(cè)五米范圍內(nèi)以及公共交通工具室外站臺和等候隊伍所在區(qū)域?qū)儆诜ǘń麩焾鏊?/strong>經(jīng)執(zhí)法部門核實，陳某在上述區(qū)域吸煙的行為已違反《控煙條例》。

深圳公交站的禁止吸煙標識

相關(guān)檢查符合規(guī)定

記者留意到，此事的焦點問題之二，是警方的執(zhí)法是否存在瑕疵？記者了解到，事發(fā)后，光明區(qū)迅速成立由衛(wèi)健、公安、交通、轄區(qū)街道組成的聯(lián)合調(diào)查組。

記者了解到，民警到場處置，因雙方堅持追究對方責任，民警依法將二人帶至公安機關(guān)執(zhí)法辦案區(qū)開展調(diào)查。根據(jù)規(guī)定，為防范可能發(fā)生的意外，涉事人員進入公安機關(guān)執(zhí)法辦案區(qū)，需接受人身安全檢查。對王某某，警方安排了女性工作人員在獨立封閉區(qū)域內(nèi)對其進行了檢查。記者向法律界人士咨詢，警方執(zhí)法過程合法合規(guī)。

Was there any flaw in the police response? According to the report, the officers initially attempted mediation, but both parties insisted on filing complaints. Police then took them to the station in accordance with legal procedures. As part of standard safety protocol, both individuals underwent a personal security check. In Wang's case, female officers conducted the check in a private, enclosed space. Legal experts cited by the newspaper said the police acted in full compliance with regulations.

法律界人士：可善意提醒或留證舉報 切勿私力強制制止

此事在社交媒體引發(fā)關(guān)注和討論。大家認為，涉事男子在公共場合尤其是禁煙區(qū)域吸煙，此行為本來就不對且違反法規(guī)，市民予以勸導(dǎo)屬熱心之舉，但過程中，王某某的行為也有沖動過激之嫌。

The incident has sparked heated discussion on social media. Many netizens said that smoking in a public place, especially in a designated non-smoking area, is both inappropriate and illegal, and that those who intervene are acting in good faith. However, some also argued that Wang's response may have been overly aggressive.

此事也引發(fā)法律界人士廣泛討論。廣東晟典律師事務(wù)所高級合伙人毛鵬律師強調(diào)，普通市民若善意勸阻無效，最合理、合法的處置方式是留存證據(jù)，向?qū)?yīng)行政執(zhí)法部門求助，由專業(yè)行政人員依法處置，而非自行采取潑水、爭執(zhí)、阻攔等強制手段。即便市民出發(fā)點是制止不文明違規(guī)行為，一旦私自采取強制干預(yù)手段，對他人造成干擾、沖突，原本占理的一方反而會陷入被動，甚至可能觸犯治安管理相關(guān)法律法規(guī)。

對此，你怎么看？

來源：中國青年報綜合光明區(qū)聯(lián)合調(diào)查組、深圳特區(qū)報

跟著China Daily

精讀英語新聞

“無痛”學英語，每天20分鐘就夠！